
TYPE OF SUPPORT
Research Background
Public interest documents are records that shine light on the workings of government. Examples of these documents include proceedings of Federal, State and Territory parliaments (Hansards), submissions to public inquiries, transcripts of public hearings, Ministerial diaries, conflict of interest and lobbying registers. Significant efforts have been made to make these documents more openly available for interested parties over the past few decades.
However, a ‘last-mile’ problem remains where most datasets of public interest documents are difficult to systematically consume and analyse because they are primarily shared as individual files intended for human rather than machine reading. This limits the ability of researchers across the HASS and Indigenous research community to effectively use these valuable documents and tackle key research questions in the public interest. This is partly because of gaps in the datasets and partly due to the wide variety of formats and structures used.
Significant data transformation and processing is required to make them usable for anything beyond reading individual files. Only people with specific technical skills and expertise can do this. This leads to rework, repetition, and wasted effort on the part of researchers. Many valuable projects are abandoned or limited in scope before they even start due to the high costs for researchers to access and work with these documents. This limitation affects not just computational uses of these datasets, but also limits qualitative and interpretive analysis. The volume of documents available typically requires careful filtering and selection of examples to be analysed in more detail and these documents are rarely published in ways that support this filtering.
This project aims to:
Deliver a platform that makes existing public interest documents (starting with Federal Hansard and public inquiries and reviews) more easily accessible to a wider audience of researchers, civil society organisations and the broader public.
Provide a standard for Public Interest (PI) document metadata that supports FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. This will include compatibility with existing metadata standards such as the Australian Government Record Keeping Standard.
Support researchers by creating and documenting research workflows and use cases, including both computational and qualitative workflows.
The RAPID project builds on, and will contribute to the Language Data Commons of Australia (LDaCA) technology architecture. Specifically, the RAPID project will apply the LDACA RO-Crate tools and the Oni data portal to collections of public interest documents consistent with the PILARS protocols.
This application will develop the underlying technologies by applying them to new use cases and developing new functionality that could potentially be integrated into the LDaCA project architecture.
QCIF Role
QCIF's Dr Evelyn Ansell will collaborate with UQ, ARDC, and QUT leads to develop the project plan and will be joining the project team as the Researcher Engagement Lead.
Once the project kicks off in January, a QCIF software developer will also join the project's technical team.
Research Outcome & Impact
This project will deliver transformative benefits to a wide range of humanities and social sciences researchers, civil sector organisations, and the broader public. By improving access to Public Interest (PI) documents, it will enable new research possibilities, foster transparency, and strengthen evidence-based policy and public discourse.
Researchers across disciplines such as education, political science, linguistics, history, sociology, law and justice, communications and media studies, social policy, Indigenous studies, and creative arts and cultural policy will gain unprecedented access to critical resources. This expanded accessibility will support diverse disciplinary needs and encourage innovative approaches to research.
A key outcome of the project is the creation of mechanisms that make Federal Hansard and public inquiries and reviews easily accessible to a much wider audience. In addition, the project will produce a scoping document outlining the work required to extend these mechanisms to all State and Territory Parliamentary Proceedings in future phases. This forward-looking approach ensures scalability and long-term impact.
To further enhance research workflows, the project will deliver a comprehensive and searchable directory of Australian Government-run public inquiries and reviews, making it easier for researchers to identify and locate relevant inquiries. It will also develop a searchable index of submissions to significant inquiries and reviews, including associated metadata, covering both State/Territory and Federal levels since 2010.
Beyond access, the project will empower researchers through a GLAM Workbench-style “Public Interest Documents as Data” Guide, complemented by training and outreach activities.
These resources will explain how to use, interpret, and analyse PI documents within various research and public interest contexts, enabling more ambitious and impactful research.
Finally, the project will establish best practices and methodologies for extending the breadth and depth of accessible public interest documents. This foundation will benefit researchers, civil society, and the general public across multiple areas of interest, ensuring that the impact of this initiative is both broad and enduring.

I frequently talk about the type of research work that researchers can see is possible, but is locked behind a skills horizon. If they could just get over that horizon, imagine all the sorts of research they could do! But because they would need some more skills to get there, and until they get there they won't know if it was worth it, and a researcher needs to be very careful where they invest their limited resources... it's easier to choose the well trodden path instead.
What we're doing in this project is building them a ladder, and holding it steady while they scale.
Dr Evelyn Ansell, Lead, QCIF Qualitative Research

